|
Written by Alex DiBranco | Change.org
|
|

I don't know about you, but if I paid for a "Respect Choice" fundraising specialty license plate, I'd think I was shelling out to raise money for an organization that actually, you know, respects choice. But in Virginia, they prefer to dupe pro-choice supporters into buying "Trust Women/Respect Choice" license plates that actually deny funding to pro-choice, women-trusting groups.
About half the states in our country already offer "Choose Life" license plates, which unfortunately raise money for groups that don't want to let women choose, and for lying crisis pregnancy centers that manipulate women instead of informing them. In Virginia, pro-choice supporters who want to wear their beliefs on their bumper decided it was high time to fight back with "Trust Women/Respect Choice" plates, which would provide funds for comprehensive reproductive health services and information at Planned Parenthood.
Yet Right Wing Watch points out there's been a ridiculous twist in the House bill authorizing these plates: an amendment has decided to take the funds away from Planned Parenthood, and give them to the Virginia Pregnant Women Support Fund.
|
|
|
Written by David Swanson
|
|
A bill to create single-payer healthcare in California has passed that state's senate for the third time now. Californians just need to persuade a governor to sign it. Single-payer healthcare bills are advancing in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Minnesota, Massachusetts, and a growing list of states, including New Mexico, where State Senator Jerry Ortiz y Pino, a long-time supporter of single-payer healthcare, is running for Lieutenant Governor. Now North Carolina house candidate Marcus Brandon has pledged to introduce a bill to create single-payer healthcare in that state. Brandon, whom I know and like and who worked for Congressman Dennis Kucinich's 2008 presidential campaign, is a candidate in North Carolina House District 60. That's near Greensboro, where I can just picture Marcus sitting at a lunch counter and refusing to be provoked. Brandon has promised that if he is elected, the first piece of legislation he will introduce will be the "North Carolina Healthcare Act" which will provide universal single-payer healthcare to every citizen of the state. Brandon says that he remains a supporter of national single-payer healthcare and will continue lobbying for passage of HR 676, Congressman John Conyers' bill: "The HR 676 fight is definitely not over, but we must now strategically shift the focus to the state level. When other states see that we can cut the cost of healthcare, streamline our medical industry, and still provide universal coverage to all North Carolinians, then all of the sudden, single-payer health care doesn't look so bad." Brandon argues that a single-payer system could save over $1.5 billion per year in reduced bureaucracy in the state of North Carolina alone. And he speaks confidently about making this happen: “North Carolina is poised to be the first state to adopt single-payer, once I am able to introduce it. North Carolinians are ready for real solutions to healthcare. North Carolina has the third highest healthcare cost of any state, while it sags at 37th in average income. This is a disparity that most North Carolinians feel when they have to think about healthcare. Every day, as I am knocking on doors to talk to voters, I hear stories of people who cannot afford insurance and become victims of this for-profit industry." Brandon says his bill is similar to other states' initiatives such as the "Minnesota Health Act" or the "California Universal Healthcare Act." Brandon points to these two bills as excellent examples of how a single payer healthcare system could be both fiscally sound and provide full coverage. Brandon served in 2007 and 2008 as Dennis Kucinich’s National Finance Director and Deputy Campaign Manager. He says that Kucinich inspired him:
|
|
Written by Donna Smith | Caifornia Nurses/National Nurses Organizing Committee
|
|
Ah, the politics of it all. Healthcare reform may or may not pass through the 111th Congress. President Obama may or may not be successful in crafting further concessions to a Senate or House version of health reform that he dubbed “health insurance reform” in order to step away from any appearance of a deeper government role in the debate or in the final product. But who will claim the dead?
As they debate and now gather for more push-me-pull-me meetings, more Americans will die waiting for healthcare. 124 every day, according to a Harvard study oft quoted by President Obama. Those who will die later today and tomorrow and every day thereafter aren’t playing politics and their deaths are the direct result of bi-partisan failure to stop the killing.
The debate needs to be about the dead and how to prevent more from dying. Reframe and reclaim this debate for them – not for political gain.
Republicans and Democrats will join at the White House on February 25, 2010, to talk about it. In the meantime, the political strategists and media pundits who like to simultaneously influence public opinion and also then predict how successfully they have influenced public opinion will go into high wind trying to find out which political position will garner the highest ratings, listenership and readership and therefore sell the most ad time and space.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 09 April 2010 18:39 |
|
Written by Jim Hightower
|
|
America is under assault. From coast to coast, we are being invaded by horrific, body-consuming mutants that are already destroying 65,000 American lives a year. As a Duke University scientist puts it, "This is a living, breathing problem. It's here. It's arrived."
These are not invaders from mars, but from within our own countryside. Ironically, these are mutants of our own creation, leaving America face to face with a spreading plague of drug-resistant germs.
For decades, we have benefited enormously from the healing wonders of antibiotics. These drugs save millions of lives that would otherwise be lost to microbial infections. But more and more of the antibiotics in America's medical kit are proving to be ineffective against the plethora of germs that endanger us. Why? Too much of a good thing.
|
|
Written by Bryan Horwath | Dunn County News
|
 It was clear what topic was at the forefront of most people’s minds during a listening session with Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wisconsin) at Boyceville High School on Saturday — health care, health care and more health care.
The topic of the day included concerns over health care costs, the so-called government takeover of health care, requests for universal health care, and horror stories from individuals and small business owners over what many described as a broken system.
After a couple of questions about the perceived lack of civility among politicians in Washington and the possibility of peak oil becoming a real concern, the health care questions started coming in droves.
Singling out single payer
One resident wanted to know why the single-payer system — popular in other industrialized nations — isn’t on the table any longer with regard to President Obama’s health care reform bill.
|
|
Written by Erika Wood | Brennan Center for Justice
|
|
Nicole Kief at the ACLU discovered a recent, interesting development re: the Democracy Restoration Act and other voting issues that we wanted to let you know about. During an online chat last week, Heather Higginbottom, from the White House Domestic Policy Council, was asked about felony disenfranchisement by a disenfranchised citizen in Virginia. Ms. Higgenbottom responded that "[This is an issue] that many legislators, and President Obama is among them, was in the Senate and is now as President, believes we should address at the federal level."
Ms. Higginbottom did not mention the DRA by name, and (like a lot of people who don't live and breath this stuff) she doesn't make a clear distinction between restoring voting rights to people who are out of prison and to those who have completed their entire sentence. But she goes on to say, "What we need to do is find more ways to encourage people to participate in the political process. We have talked about ways of doing that across the board. This is an area where we want more people to vote, we want to make it easier to vote. And the President's position and many others legislators' position is that, for felons, once you've served your sentence and you've done your time and you've completed that, you should have your voting rights restored.”
It is very exciting to hear the White House weigh in on this issue in such a positive way, and to clearly state that this is an issue that should be addressed at the federal level. We should work to clarify the administration's position on post-incarceration vs. post-sentence restoration, but in the meantime I think we should use these comments in our advocacy. Of course we cannot say that the White House supports the DRA (yet) but we can certainly say that the administration thinks this is an issue that should be addressed at the federal level.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 09 April 2010 21:08 |
|
|
|
|
«StartPrev12345678910NextEnd»
|
|
Page 7 of 21 |